Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

feedburner count

I Guess I've Never Been a "Conscientious" DM

Labels: , , , ,

I just read an article about D&D4's treasure and economy over on the WOTC web site. Excerpts: Economy & Reward wherein I was told that "conscientious" GMs figure out how much treasure the characters in their game should get while advancing from their current level to the next and carefully divide that up between the 10 encounters needed to go up a level in D&D 4 (or 13-1/3 encounters needed in 3.x). In 4th edition this has been made so much easy because the DMG lists 10 "treasure packets" for each level and you just assign them to the encounters as needed.

I guess I've never been a conscientious DM. I've never worried that much about how much treasure a party might get or that the right mix of level-appropriate magic items were included. Monsters were scattered around dungeons and wilderness areas -- with treasure appropriate to the monster -- and characters would go do their thing. If they somehow managed to kill a red dragon at first level and cart away all its loot, they were very rich second level characters with a lot of loot to protect from people more powerful than they were (and probably end up loosing a lot of it). If they encountered a bunch goblins in their lair at 9th level, they would probably not find much loot and certainly not the level appropriate loot WOTC editions seem to expect them to find.

I guess "Old School" really was a completely different style of play.

Update: I see I'm not the only person to comment on this WOTC article. Here are links to a few other blog posts I've seen on this today:

Most of these posts are far less kind than mine.

James Maliszewski said...
May 15, 2008 at 6:15 PM  

I have a feeling that the term "conscientious DM" will soon become a watchword in the old school gaming community. Goodness knows I plan on using it.

Randall said...
May 15, 2008 at 6:36 PM  

I suspect you are right. The term is just too good to pass up.

Of course, the more I see of 4th edition, the more I think that no "conscientious DM" would touch it. I've never been a fan of 3rd edition, but it is still recognizable as D&D. The more I see of 4th, the less it looks like any D&D I know or would be interested in.

Post a Comment

Post a Comment