feedburner
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

feedburner count

Why I Still Play Old Role-Playing Games

Labels: , ,

I'm often asked why I play old RPGs instead of whatever the current fad is or whatever the latest edition of the game I'm playing is. Of course, most people asking are really asking why I have no interest in the latest version of D&D. In any case, my answer is really simple. I play games I own and enjoy.

I'm more likely to try a new game if it isn't trying to replace an old favorite, especially if it is doing so by trying to take an old favorite in directions I do not enjoy. D&D started going in directions I did not enjoy much with 2e. After a few years, I even stopped buying 2e stuff.

3e looked great at first, then I discovered how long combat was and how character build-oriented it was quickly becoming -- two things I loathe in RPGs. I dropped it quickly. I tried 4e but immediately discovered that it was even more into long detailed combats than 3.x was, that 4e rules actions did not map to reality very well -- and the damn build-orientation was still there, although toned down.

New ceased being better in the D&D world for me about 1992/1993 because the designers moved the newer versions game further and further away from the type of play I enjoyed into types of play I did not find fun at all. However, I have all this OD&D, AD&D1e, B/X, BECMI/RC D&D (and even some AD&D2e) stuff that still plays well and caters to the style I enjoy, so I play it. I really can't imagine why this surprises so many people. I don't waste a lot of time and money on all sorts of different D&D-like games in the hope that one of them will be better for me than what I already have, know well, and really enjoy.

Note that I'm like this with everything. I drive a 1998 minivan and 1982 car. They both work well and do their job, so why waste money on new ones just because they exist and many people think they are much better (for what they value as "better") than what I have? I guess I lack the "newer must be better" gene or something. I know friends in marketing and advertising have told me many times that they are glad most people aren't like me. :)

That said, I do pick up new games every once in a while. They are usually games for subjects I think I might enjoy but do not already have a "go to" game for -- or a system that appears to have a new and interesting (to me) take on a subject I really like. I buy based on what interests me, not on the need of some game company to put out a new version or whatever. Also, I seldom buy sight unseen any more. If I can't sit down and look through the game rules for an hour or so before purchasing it, chances are pretty good that I'll just decide to save my money rather than chance wasting it on yet another game that sounded good but turned out to be something I would probably never play more than once or twice.

However, it all boils down to I play what I like and I don't care if what I like isn't that popular, that new, or even that good in the eyes of some game design theorist.

8 comments:
gravatar
Yoo-Hoo Tom said...
June 2, 2010 at 8:42 PM  

Glad to see I'm not alone. I stopped playing in '91 and I'm just entering my second year of my return to D&D. I do play 4E though because I can't find anyone to play 1E. I like the monster builder because I can easily re-stat the Morkoth and the Xvart.

gravatar
Todd the Viking King said...
June 2, 2010 at 9:10 PM  

I'm of the same mind, but feel myself tempted by some Indie Games, and try them out from time to time... However, I ALWAYS find myself coming home to Holmes.

I still have my battered copy of Holmes with highlighted sections I long ago memorized, and the Harpies with their "boobies" colored in with Number Two graphite. My dad was a Pastor and my mum was worried that D&D might be bad... I was taking no chances and colored those puppies over so that Holmes wouldn't end up in the same fire my AC~DC 8-track tapes ended up in... The perils we survived as teenagers in 1978; amazing, simply amazing...

gravatar
Daddy Grognard said...
June 3, 2010 at 6:48 AM  

@Todd - back in 78, I wished my mum and dad would take any kind of interest in what I was doing but reading your post, I guess I didn't have it all bad...

gravatar
Randall said...
June 3, 2010 at 7:58 AM  

Todd: Fortunately, I was 18 when I bought my copy of OD&D in 1975 so my parents couldn't say much. Not that they would have. They didn't buy the D&D was evil nonsense when it started in the early 1980s. Of course, by then I had been playing games for years and they had seen first hand what happened in a game. No magic spells cast, no demons summoned, no human sacrifices -- just a bunch of people sitting around a table talking, eating, and rolling dice every once in a while.

gravatar
highadventuregames said...
June 3, 2010 at 1:59 PM  

Way to be. Play what you like. Now mind you, I like a lot of different games. Newer is not necessarily better, but Older isn't either. Cheers,

~Adaen of Bridgewater

gravatar
Robert Fisher said...
June 3, 2010 at 3:27 PM  

I don’t think many people play newer games just because they’re newer. When 2e came out, I switched because (at the time) I liked many of the changes. When I left D&D for other systems, it was because I didn’t want D&D anymore. When I came back to classic D&D, it was because I wanted D&D again, and 3e wasn’t doing it for me. My friends who play 3e genuinely like 3e. (Heck, I like it too, though it isn’t my game of choice.)

I don’t know anybody yet who plays or likes 4e.

gravatar
A Paladin In Citadel said...
June 3, 2010 at 10:20 PM  

Someone's liking and playing 4E. Power to them.

I'm willing to try any game, though my preference now leans now towards strategy-heavy and rules-light.

When I can't get my RPG fix, I can always rely on getting together with those friends who play eurogames like Settlers, Ticket to Ride and such.

gravatar
xgametop said...
June 5, 2010 at 7:50 AM  

arcade arcade 100 top

Post a Comment

Post a Comment